英语翻译Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggestconsiderabl

英语翻译Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggestconsiderabl
英语翻译
Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;
yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggest
considerable promise.Third,a liberal theory of state preferences is themost fundamental
type of IR theory.Hypotheses that endogenize changes in state preferences
deserve equal treatment in monocausal explanations and analytical priorityin multicausal
ones,because liberal theory defines the theoretical and empirical domainsin
which it is appropriate even to consider realist and institutionalistclaims.Thus those
who ignore liberal theory do not simply sacrifice comprehensiveness; theyundermine
valid empirical evaluation of their own theories.Only by building onthese
three conclusions can liberals and their critics supplant debates overlabels with
debates over data.
We have seen that even monocausal
empirical tests of realist and institutionalist theories must control reliably for variation
in underlying preferences (not just strategies) of states.This requires precisely
the same detailed research into domestic politics.Such a baseline control is,moreover,
most reliable where backed by an explicit and generalizable theory of domestic
preference formation,that is,a liberal theory.In short,research into domestic preference
formation is unavoidable.

英语翻译Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggestconsiderabl
只有进一步的研究才能揭示他们的全部经验主义能量；然而,目前的研究---从民主和平到内生关税理论的阐释,到与国内机构有关理论的阐释,到对外政策思想的阐释---却表明很有希望.第三,国家偏好的自由理论是国际关系理论中最基本的类型.引发国家偏好内生变化的假说需要同样地进行单一因果关系阐释和多重因果关系的优先分析,因为自由理论规范了理论领域和经验领域,在这些领域中,即使是考虑现实主义和机构主义的主张也是合适的.因此,忽略自由理论的人不仅仅牺牲了广泛性；他们同时也低估了他们自己理论的有效经验价值.只有以这三个结论为基础,自由派及其批评者才能用针对数据的辩论来取代针对标签的辩论.我们已经观察到,在构成国家偏好（不仅仅是战略）时,即使是现实主义和机构主义理论的单一因果关系经验测试也必须可靠地控制变量.这就需要完全同样地详细研究国内政治.另外,如果有明确的和广义的国内偏好形成理论（即自由理论）支持时,这种基线控制是最为可靠的.简言之,对国内偏好形成的研究是不可回避的.

Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;
只有进一步的研究可以揭示其充分的实证功率；
yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relatin...

全部展开

Only further research can reveal their full empirical power;
只有进一步的研究可以揭示其充分的实证功率；
yet existing studies-from explanations of the democratic peace toendogenous tariff theory to theories relating domestic institutions and ideasto foreign policy-suggest
然而，现有的研究从民主和平toendogenous关税理论解释国内相关机构和外交政策的理论提出的观点
considerable promise. Third, a liberal theory of state preferences is themost fundamental
相当的承诺。第三，一个自由的国家偏好理论最基本的
type of IR theory. Hypotheses that endogenize changes in state preferences
国际关系理论的类型。假设内生偏好的变化状态
deserve equal treatment in monocausal explanations and analytical priorityin multicausal
应该得到平等的待遇在单一原因的解释和分析priorityinmulticausal
ones, because liberal theory defines the theoretical and empirical domainsin
的，因为自由主义理论的定义，理论和实证domainsin
which it is appropriate even to consider realist and institutionalistclaims. Thus those
它是适当的考虑和institutionalistclaims甚至现实主义。因此，那些
who ignore liberal theory do not simply sacrifice comprehensiveness; theyundermine
那些忽视自由主义理论不只是牺牲theyundermine综合性；
valid empirical evaluation of their own theories. Only by building onthese
他们自己的理论有效的实证评价。只有建立这些
three conclusions can liberals and their critics supplant debates overlabels with
三结论可以自由主义者和他们的批评和辩论overlabels取代
debates over data.
争论的数据。
We have seen that even monocausal
我们已经看到，即使是单一原因
empirical tests of realist and institutionalist theories must control reliably for variation
现实主义和制度主义理论的实证检验，必须控制可靠的变化
in underlying preferences (not just strategies) of states. This requires precisely
在潜在的偏好（不只是策略）的状态。这需要精确的
the same detailed research into domestic politics. Such a baseline control is, moreover,
同时详细研究国内政治。这样一个基线控制，而且，
most reliable where backed by an explicit and generalizable theory of domestic
最可靠的国内一个明确的和普及的理论支持
preference formation, that is, a liberal theory. In short, research into domestic preference
偏好的形成，即，一个自由主义理论。总之，为国内偏好研究
formation is unavoidable.
的形成是不可避免的。

收起